-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: >>> The real problem as you noted in your original message is that >>> there's no way to >>> distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a >>> cache of >>> bytecode for a py file, and a pyc file that is intended to be used >>> standalone. >> >> Isn't the existing or non-existing of a corresponding .py file a good >> indication? > > No, because you may have intended to remove the module.
Marking the directories containing the sourceless .pyc files as readonly would be a reasonable workaround: if your forgot the '-k', the testrunner would just whine and halt. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFLWiZ+gerLs4ltQ4RAls5AJ4uWRuEx3mG4QUignNAk6GAOG9LnACgipti HwY/HqIds70ZCIecVeHpA/g= =WmcQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
