On Sunday 22 October 2006 14:21, Jim Fulton wrote: > 2. Making it much easier to implement configuration handlers and > actions is important when there are many different handlers and > actions. This was true when we moved to schema-based > configuration but now many of us would like to see a smaller > selection of configuration options.
I think the desire to have a smaller set of configuration options is due to the fact that a lot of teams work pretty much in a Python developer environment. In the two projects I am involved in, there is a desire to develop high-level configuration directives to allow another audience to do customization and integration. Zope 3 Developers (be it core Python or template integration developers) are a real scarce at this point, so we need to find solutions to make other developers productive without them knowing the dirt about Zope 3. Thus, I would really hate to see ZCML directive creation to become more difficult. But then, you (Jim) said that you want to be BBB, so I am not worried. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
