On 10/24/06, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
itself, or is it a conventional package?
Hmm. After I asked this, Gary pointed out that the package doesn't
actually provide the MochiKit/dojo/... content; there's some
undocumented expectation that those come from elsewhere.
My first guess is that this is a licensing-related issue; is that right?
I think the expected usage/buildout pattern needs to be documented.
(I have a general desire to retire an internal package we've been
using with something that's shared, but this only makes sense if the
community package is documented.)
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Every sin is the result of a collaboration." --Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Zope3-dev mailing list