Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
<adapter
for=".myclasses.MyClass"
provides=".interfaces.ISomething"
factory=".adapters.MyAdapter"
/>
I think it is a fine idea. That's why it has been supported for
a long time. You can register adapters and views (which, of course
are adapters) for classes as well as interfaces.
Yay! *sound of a million marker interfaces dying*
Hmm, is this documented anywhere?
The ZCML docs distinguish between fields that require a GlobalObject vs.
a GlobalInterface. When a GlobalObject is required, that usually means
you can specify a class instead of an interface. Hopefully, the adapter
directive uses a schema that expects a GlobalObject for the "for" field.
Shane
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
