Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
<adapter
    for=".myclasses.MyClass"
    provides=".interfaces.ISomething"
    factory=".adapters.MyAdapter"
    />


I think it is a fine idea.  That's why it has been supported for
a long time.  You can register adapters and views (which, of course
are adapters) for classes as well as interfaces.

Yay! *sound of a million marker interfaces dying*

Hmm, is this documented anywhere?

The ZCML docs distinguish between fields that require a GlobalObject vs. a GlobalInterface. When a GlobalObject is required, that usually means you can specify a class instead of an interface. Hopefully, the adapter directive uses a schema that expects a GlobalObject for the "for" field.

Shane

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to