Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think it is a fine idea. That's why it has been supported for
a long time. You can register adapters and views (which, of course
are adapters) for classes as well as interfaces.
Yay! *sound of a million marker interfaces dying*
Hmm, is this documented anywhere?
The ZCML docs distinguish between fields that require a GlobalObject vs.
a GlobalInterface. When a GlobalObject is required, that usually means
you can specify a class instead of an interface. Hopefully, the adapter
directive uses a schema that expects a GlobalObject for the "for" field.
Zope3-dev mailing list