On 11/13/06, Jean-Marc Orliaguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, but if you register an adapter for a base class you don't have to register it for subclasses, do you?
I don't know, but again you then need to either subclass or re-register for that calss, but if you register it for an interface, you can eiterh subclass or implement the interface.
subclasses will pick up the same adapter. Provided that you use classes for typing your objects and not interfaces.
Class and interfaces do different kinds of "typing". You do both, normally.
> I'm not sure the proliferication (?) of marker interfaces is a big > risk. But if we get many of them, it still works better than the > options of magic __something__ attributes. :) but conceptually it is the same mess :-) i.e. a total lack of specification.
I don't agree with that at all. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com