> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: WebDAV Future
> > zwebdavext.zopelocking, zwebdavext.zopefile - extensions
> This I like, but renaming zwebdavext -> zwebdavapp :-) This
> allows a clearer seperatation between the protocol components
> and the application components, which is what want now that I
> think about it.
> For example zwebdavext.zopefile isn't really an extension but
> more integration code for zwebdav and any application which
> uses zope.file. Then in the future I can hopefully get to
> work on zwebdav.dasl, zwebdav.acl etc. which are extensions
> to the protocol and hence should belong in zwebdav with more
> coresponding integration modules in zwebdavapp.
Why this complex naming? I really like to see a namespace package
called z3c.webdav and use sub packages like:
If this doesn't fit for distribution, buildout or eggs,
or other things I missed, why not:
But anyway that's up to you, I'm sure you will do it right and
I like your work anyway ;-)
Sorry if I missed something, I didn't read all the full thread.
> Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev mailing list