On 5/3/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When a truly egg-based Zope3 ships, it should be a meta-egg with
explicitly-versioned dependencies.


That seems right to me.

Approximating that in tree would be to have the Zope3 tree point at
*tagged releases* of the satellite projects;  revision-stamped versions
are a poor (but acceptable in the near-term) substitute.

That sounds reasonable to me.

Tracking the
trunk of any dependency is not acceptable:  it undoes the reason for
moving the projects out-of-tree in the first place.  If we aren't going
to do release management on the pieces, then for sanity's sake keep them
in-tree.

Again, that sounds reasonable to me, but since I've disclaimed caring
about the Zope 3 conglomerate checkout/release, I'll not push my
thoughts on that on those who do.  You're certainly welcome to make
the right decision on your own.  ;-)


 -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to