On Wednesday 23 May 2007 11:07, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This solution would not be fully backward-compatible with people
> > including package "configure.zcml" files manually. I think this is okay,
> > since people often do not even want the browser stuff.
> That's hard to predict; some do, some don't, I don't know where "most"
> happens to fall.
Thinking about it more, it would actually be backward-compatible, since we
never released the packages in themselves but always as part of the Zope 3
bundle. Also, even the packages that are not hooked in via zope.app.zcmlfiles
are added via the automated SETUP.cfg stuff. At least this is the official
story right now. :-)
> > A fully backward solution would be to put all the generic package
> > configuration in a new ZCML file and combine them both in
> > "configure.zcml". However, I find that solution very undesirable, so I
> > hope noone will like it either. :-)
> I don't like that, but I don't think it's avoidable.
I hope it is avoidable with the above insight.
> 3.4 is never going to be released, is it? That might bother some
> people (though not me).
Really? That would be a pitty, because it would allow us to have one release
with the old and the new way, so the first people can migrate.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list