-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On May 31, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I'd rather have the dot, e.g. "foo 2.* >= 2.5", just for clarity:
>> - It makes the intent clearer (that you want any version in the
>> "two dot" release line).
>> - It disambiguates the case where the version number might have
>> double digits (e.g, '0.1' vs. '0.10').
> This depends on how the * is interpreted. setuptools already treats
> dots as optional in many cases and this would be one more. I also
> prefer the last syntax I suggested without the "*". So, the example
> would become:
> "foo 2, >=2.5"
That seems like an empty set to me.
> (I forgot commas in my earlier examples.)
> Without the *, I think there is less of tendency to interpret the
> specification as a glob.
>> Another feature I'm not sure is already in setuptools:
>> - I *don't* want dev releases to replace production ones
>> implicitly: no package should be able to install a non-released
>> version without explicit callout. If this isn't already the
>> default behavior, then I'd like syntax for spelling it.
> What do you mean by a "dev" release?
Any release tagged as "alpha", "beta", "rc", "pre", or with an SVN revision.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope3-dev mailing list