Martijn Faassen wrote: > Just to drop a note that I think a discussion about a potential brand > name for Zope 3 is far less important than actually fixing our website > and presenting Zope 3 (and Zope 2 for that matter) in a better way. > > Perhaps we can better redirect our energies to that than to have long > (but easy, as everybody can say something without having to do anything) > discussions about something that in the end isn't going to matter that > much.
Yes, thank you :). Now I don't have to catch up with this insanely long thread. > Zope 3 already has a recognized brand as a rewrite of Zope 2 in the > community - let's go with that. Indeed. Plus, I strongly feel that pushing Zope 3 more than Zope 2 or viceversa isn't helping. We need to push Zope-the-technology and Zope-the-community. Branding Zope 3 and making it look like something separate now when Zope 2 is actually moving towards Zope 3 feels like a step back. Let's promote Zope. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
