Hi Benji. The universal part makes sense for synchronization. Maybe this
is not as much of an issue for others, but I have been looking to
implement a UUID solution with this in mind.
Regards,
David
Benji York wrote:
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim. Where should this be done (separate identifier). I was
thinking of a UUID of some sort when I read this which could be
helpful for other things.
UUIDs can be quite useful, but for identifying objects within a database
the "universal" part doesn't make much sense, hence things like the
intid utility.
_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
