Chris Withers wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally >> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for >> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead >> putting everything in site.zcml useful, because it's easier to see in >> one place what's included and what not. > > I certainly prefer this ;-) > > That said, I do like Apache 2 - on - Debian's a2enmod, a2dismod, > a2ensite and a2dissite. If Zope had equivalents, I'd probably flip round > to the other view...
I suggested such a script once, http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/philipp-weitershausen/2006_01_11_mata-los-productos Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
