Chris Withers wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally
>> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for
>> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead
>> putting everything in site.zcml useful, because it's easier to see in
>> one place what's included and what not.
> I certainly prefer this ;-)
> That said, I do like Apache 2 - on - Debian's a2enmod, a2dismod,
> a2ensite and a2dissite. If Zope had equivalents, I'd probably flip round
> to the other view...
I suggested such a script once,
Zope3-users mailing list