> Hi Roger. This is really interesting. It would be good to see
> a very small demo of these nice packages you have been
> contributing - something
> that would put together the minimal layer, menu package,
> and a few basic viewlets just to give folks a basic idea of
> what can be acheived 'minimally'. Also a clearer
> understanding of where to use trusted over the basic layer. I
> would seem that this is the road to some very dynamic
> skinning flexibility.
That whould be nice, but right now I don't have time for doing
such a *how to* sample. Let me know if somebody likes to doing
this. Perhaps I can help a little bit.
> The one thing perhaps missing from this is a mechanism for
> storing and manipulating viewlets and selecting a template on
> a container. Perhaps a template manager is also needed. What
> I am missing from Zope2 is the simple ability to drop an
> index.html or different template into a folder as a simple
> way to make folder views that are based on site context.
> Sites can be pretty terrible otherwise if they are not
> sensitive to where you are and display the same organization
> of viewlets. If viewlets/viewlet managers and a template can
> be maintained as annotations on a container and the weighting
> of viewlet managers manipulated through a form instead of
> zcml then we'd be cooking with gas. :-)
I agree on that, at least on the functionality. Stephan and I
will implement a portlet like concept some time in the future.
Such a concept will support to build standalone applications
as viewlets with own urls and states etc. This should be enough
base for all future concepts where I can think about.
> Roger Ineichen wrote:
> > Hi Jeff
> > [...]
> >> With the ZMI, I end up asking "is this the UI I want to
> >> deliver to my customer?" And the answer is rarely "yes!" I
> >> feel like I have to arm wrestle a lot more to turn off and
> >> hide features. I still don't really understand how the 'Add'
> >> menu works.
> > Did you see the layer package I commited to the z3c repos the
> > last days?
> > There is now a minimal layer which allows you to build
> > very easy a own administration interface.
> >> This isn't a criticism of the ZMI skin. It just hasn't been a
> >> fit for any of our customers or applications, which makes it
> >> very hard to support. Fortunately, it's fairly easy to do
> >> away with. But it also feels very hard to migrate away from
> >> if that's where ones initial work is.
> > We really should use the Boston skin which offers much more
> > flexibility for such customized ZMI's because of it's
> > viewlet/manager concept and drop the Rotterdam skin.
> > [...]
> >> Having developed on and for Zope for nearly ten years now, I
> >> can say that there is no such thing as "traditional zope
> >> development" :).
> >> There are a lot of ways to get things done.
> > ;-)
> > Regards
> > Roger Ineichen
> > _____________________________
> > Projekt01 GmbH
> >> --
> >> Jeff Shell
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Zope3-users mailing list
> >> Zope3email@example.com
> >> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Zope3-users mailing list