Florian Lindner wrote:
> That's something I had mentioned in my posting too. It has advantage that the 
> feeds could decide if they want to be called or not, whereas by 
> the "utility-way" they would always be called.

Considering your hesitation towards the component architecture, here's
some more input:

Nowadays, registering a (persistent) object as a utility expresses
basically the same functionality. If it wants to be called, you can
register it as a utility for an interface (and maybe a name), if you
don't want to, you don't (or you unregister it).

What you automatically get is:

- you don't have to write your own registry code (again),
- the CA is optimized to do this kind of lookups

The distinction between software and content space was pretty much
removed now. Even content objects are software, or not?


gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstra├če 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Zope3-users mailing list

Reply via email to