On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:12:26PM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:34, Derek Richardson wrote:
> > I believe that that will not guarantee a *universally* unique id, but
> > only an id unique within that ZODB. Am I wrong?
> 
> Well, intid guarantees to be unique for this Zope instance, even accross 
> multiple databases conencted to this Zope instance. All you have to do is to 
> id the Zope instance, for example, ip+port should suffice.

I'd imagine collisions are likely when ip+port is 192.168.1.1:8080.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
I dont know about madness (and anyway, the little green martians dancing
around me tell me not to worry...), but I've implemented something not
unlike this just now.
        -- Peter Sabaini

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users

Reply via email to