On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:12:26PM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:34, Derek Richardson wrote: > > I believe that that will not guarantee a *universally* unique id, but > > only an id unique within that ZODB. Am I wrong? > > Well, intid guarantees to be unique for this Zope instance, even accross > multiple databases conencted to this Zope instance. All you have to do is to > id the Zope instance, for example, ip+port should suffice.
I'd imagine collisions are likely when ip+port is 192.168.1.1:8080. Marius Gedminas -- I dont know about madness (and anyway, the little green martians dancing around me tell me not to worry...), but I've implemented something not unlike this just now. -- Peter Sabaini
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users