I think ZCA doesn't do "so much more" than implement a few object design
patterns and provide a very flexible components registry framework.
I'm working mainly on developing new framework-like packages and I just
can't work without it except by re-inventing it!
Many users blame ZCML just because it's XML !
But it's just configuration, and separating configuration from
Python code is one of the greatest benefits of ZCML, mainly while
working on huge projects. The XML format is just a detail and is
probably not so worse than many INI-like or text based configuration
format; and at least it's a de-facto standard.
Le Sun, 7 Sep 2014 14:14:14 +0530,
Milind Khadilkar <zedobj...@gmail.com> a écrit:
> Thanks, Thierry.
> I think the real problem with ZCA and ZCML is "bad press". We did not
> face any ZCML problem when we worked on the Zope3 projects. It was
> later, thankfully, that we came across the negative opinion. ZCA did
> require a mindset change for some, but more often than not it has
> helped them in their future work on other platforms too.
> But that was 10 years ago... Don't know about now.
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Thierry Florac <tflo...@ulthar.net>
> > Hi,
> > Le Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:26:43 +0530,
> > Milind Khadilkar <zedobj...@gmail.com> a écrit:
> > > Seems there will be no Zope4. Puts a fond hope to rest.
> > >
> > > I have one large Zope2 (Zope 2.6) project, one large Zope3 (Zope
> > > 3.4) project, two medium sized Grok projects, one GAE project,
> > > allof them need to be maintained beyond two years.
> > > I would like, if possible, to redevelop them using ONE single
> > > framework. While some of the original developers are available,
> > > most work would need to be done through people who need to be
> > > trained from the ground up.
> > >
> > > My first choice (mainly because I have a complex Zope3 project to
> > > redevelop) would be Bluebream, even if it means using ZCML and
> > > programming in ZCA-shackles. But I am speaking without any real
> > > experience of it. (Negative press ensured that I did not go for
> > > it...)
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > If you are considering a complete re-development, maybe you should
> > have a look at Pyramid.
> > It allows you to reuse a lot of Zope related technologies, including
> > ZODB, traversing and even ZCA ! ;-)
> > I use and develop ZTFY which is based on Bluebream (with updated
> > packages based on ZTK) and which is used in many of my own projects
> > with great success, but which is probably condamned to death in a
> > relatively near future...
> > Regards,
> > Thierry
> > P.S.: by the way, I don't really understand where is the real
> > problem with ZCA (which is so powerful, and not so complicated!)
> > and with ZCML (which is nothing in XML files terms compared to any
> > "serious" Java server development environment...)
Zope3-users mailing list