On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Daryl Tester wrote:
> > No - just using the GPL'd adapter do not require you to distribute Zope
> > under GPL. The adapter is just a "plugin"; there was an explanation from
> > RMS that GPL'd plugins does not require to GPL the main program and vice
> > versa; there probably will be newer version of GPL (don't know how soon)
> > which will explain the plugin thingie in details.
> > In short - only linking with GPL code "infects" your code with GPL.
> This is unclear, and sounds like hair splitting to me. What's the
> difference between linking and using a plugin? What happens when
> the plugin is a dynamically linked shared library? I haven't seen
> PoPy, but if it's a C library interface under Python (like Pygresql)
> the chances are good.
These are perfect questions, and I knew RMS spent time thinking on it. I
am not authorized to answer; when (and if) new version of GPL will be
published I hope things will be clearer.
Oleg. (All opinions are mine and not of my employer)
Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -