On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Hamish Lawson wrote:
> I wrote:
> If a folder doesn't itself contain a required object or method, I'd
> like to have another folder looked in instead. The fall-back folder
> won't necessarily (and often can't) be higher in the hierarchy, so
> acquisition doesn't seem to be a solution.
Sorry to jump in late on the thread, just joined the list.
Is there a reason you can't do this by just messing with the namespaces
stack, ie, adding additional folders to it?
(Or a reason that's not a good idea? That's what I've been known to
do, if I correctly understand your goal...)
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative market for open source software
"Well actually I was considering opening a market in flying pigs. Mostly
because it would be more practical...." -- Alan Cox
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -