That would cause another whole set of problems, unless apache is inherity
more secure than Medusa. I was really wondering what the risks are
associated with those two options.
- Bryan Patrick Coleman
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:15 AM
> To: Coleman, Bryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Important Security Concerns
> Another option might be to proxy the Zope server through Apache on port
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Coleman, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:43 PM
> Subject: [Zope] Important Security Concerns
> > I almost have my company convinced that Zope is the technology to use
> > our Intranet/Extranet. However they are very concerned with security. I
> > proposed two security schemes that I would like zope community feed back
> > for potential holes.
> > Option A: Poke a hole through our firewall on the primary http port or
> > port 8080 to allow Zope pages through and then require authentication on
> > first page.
> > Option B: Set up a DMZ off the firewall to allow the same as the above.
> > Any feed back would be welcome.
> > - Bryan Patrick Coleman
> > Questcon Technologies
> > (336)273-2428 ext-416
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> > (Related lists -
> > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -