> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > 
> > Yes.  Thank you.
> > 
> > Note however that methods of modules accessed via the underscore namespace
> > may be filtered individually, so although 'replace' exists as a method of
> > the Python string module, this does not necessarily make it accessible
> > implicitly through Zope via _.string.replace.  It happens to be accessible
> > in this case, but I'd bet there are cases in which methods accessible
> > via modules of the _ namespace have been removed for "safe scripting"
> > purposes.
> having recently gone through the code to produce ZModules (defined
> interface for adding modules to _), it was apparent that all the modules
> that live in namespace are completely exposed.

What's the problem with that? Aren't most, if not all, the modules living
in the _ namespace just standard python modules available anyways?


Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to