How about a tested with version x field on Products?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cary O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] How about removing broken things like Confera and
> > There is a ZDiscussions that works. It is called ZUBB.
> > http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/ZUBB
> > But, I agree, old product that have been left behind (the old version
> > ZDiscussions/Confera) should be marked and or archived.
> > J
> > Might be better to have a more formal declaration of the dependencies
> > on versions of products relied upon at the download pages -- for some
> > products this has become a tricky and madning process to make sure all
> > the versions are correct for a product to run. This is natural in the
> > progress of Zope and Zope products and will become even more and issue
> > as Zope matures even further. This can be formalized. I do like the
> > way SGI does some of this.
> Bangs head. Doh!
> Why the heck don't products have explicit requirements the "package
> in TCL. Heck, python ought to.
> Import Fred(1.2) from Bedrock
> Or something like that.
> -- cary
> Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -