On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:06:25PM -0000, Chris Withers wrote: > > This suddenly rings a bell; I remember now that NS4 seems to have a > > 'grid' system for laying out frames. It snaps to certain sizes, and > > adding a few pixels plus or minus won't get you a visible change. > > Sizing of frames can only happen in larger steps. > > Wow that sucks :-( > > How does Mozilla/Netscape 6 fare on this? It doesn't use the same code-base, so I must assume for now it doesn't have the same problem. Enough people have been using it in the early development days to kick up a big fuss if it did. It has been a while since I had to know about these things though. > > this (especially when using bordelress frames). > > Speaking, of which, how about making that top frame (and maybe the side > frame) borderless? The left frame still needs to be resisable, so the > boirder may have to stay there... Half borders are painful to look at, if they can be specified that way in the first place. You don't *need* the border for resizability BTW, but you do need a visual clue there is a border there to grab and move. A contracting frame background could help there. > PS: It's really cool how you actually listened to your users and provided an > easy way to change a feature that they didn't like. I still use Office '95 > at home 'cos that *&^*&ing paperclip proved so annoying ;-) You *do* know you can switch the paperclip off, don't you? ;) -- Martijn Pieters | Software Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com/ | Creators of Zope http://www.zope.org/ --------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )