"Mayers, Philip J" wrote: > > Well, bad _technically_, or bad _evil_? Well, doing an XML export as opposed to a cp is probably a lot more processor-intensive... > It does have the sole advantage you can pull a portion of your tree, true... > and > some people have had Data.fs problems (not me thankfully). But in general > I'd guess backing up Data.fs to be the best way. How does it copy with > non-atomicity of disk writes? Very well, apparently :-) It's a sequential transaction log, so, at worst, you'll loose the last transaction... cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
