Chris Withers wrote at 2005-4-7 13:29 +0100:
> ...
>I believe in re-using lots of simple compments to build complex 
>applications. I hate to see loads of common concepts like caching, 
>sessions, cookie-management and rdb interaction re-implemented in 
>non-reusable ways so many times...

You are probably right  -- but "SimpleUserFolder" is really "simple" (which
sometimes is good).

Had *you* used all these reusable components to provide the functionality
in SUF, standard users could have used then out of the box -- with just
sumitting a configuration page. As it is now, they have to think
about (e.g.) cache management and invalidation.

I would like to stress that I do not think SUF were bad.
I just defend my statement that "exUserFolder" is something
like a big brother to SUF.

Simple is beautiful, if it meats the given requirements...

Zope maillist  -
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to