Jim Vine wrote:
> I’d greatly appreciate any guidance that can be
> provided on these subjects.
I know a lot has been said since your original query, but re-reading it
I was surprised that no one had asked a fundamental question: -
"If the data is structured in nature and fits the relational model well
(e.g. is well defined), why not use an RDBMS for the data, and
Zope/Plone for the UI?
I do full-time development of web-based RDBMS applications in Zope and
Plone (MS SQL and Firebird), and I have the following observations: -
- By putting database-related complexity in the database, where it
belongs IMHO, you may find (as I have) that the complexity of what you
need to accomplish in Zope is reduced to the point where the ZMI
approach is entirely appropriate.
- You will find yourself working very hard to implement a relational
database in the ZODB, compared to interfacing to an RDBMS. If you need
one, I'd use one - instead of writing one! ;-)
YMMV and all that - I /am/ an RDBMS zealot (see Fabian Pascal's writing
for the mindset!), and I am /not/ a Python wizard (although my Python-Fu
grows stronger by the day due to immersion in Zope...), so my choice of
approach was strongly influenced by my starting point.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public key: http://www.xfr.co.uk
Voicemail & Facsimile: 07092 070518
"You'll find that one part's sweet and one part's tart:
say where the sweetness and the sourness start."
- Tony Harrison
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -