On 7/8/05, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2005-7-8 13:24 +0100:
> >I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
> >because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference.
> The security manager could be changed (e.g. with "newSecurityManager").
> "getSecurityManager" would report the change but not "AUTHENTICATED_USER".

"newSecurityManager" ??
never heard of that. The __doc__ says
""" Set up a new security context for a request for a user """

What is this used for? I'm guessing it's something we use in unittests
and stuff.

Peter Bengtsson, 
work www.fry-it.com
home www.peterbe.com
hobby www.issuetrackerproduct.com
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to