Hi Michael, michael nt milne wrote: > Ok, thanks. Yes, Apache would be much better to route traffic through. > And also it looks like a complete pain to try and route traffic > through IIS. Is Apache for windows good? I only have experience of it > on UNIX> >
Works fine - once it's up and running and you are looking at the .conf file, you will probably barely notice the difference. > Since I am not expecting very high traffic for my site at first I am > going to use the Zope server at first. My head is hurting too much > just now! > Understood! > By the way do you have any experience of altering the zope database or > adding fields to the registration process on Plone etc? Seems a wee > bit tricky and a client wants extra fields etc. > That's one for the Plone list - but there is now a release candidate out for Plone 2.1, and I understand such things are simpler in that version. There may be an existing CMF/Plone product that does what you want for that matter. -- Regards, PhilK Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public key: http://www.xfr.co.uk Voicemail & Facsimile: 07092 070518 "You'll find that one part's sweet and one part's tart: say where the sweetness and the sourness start." - Tony Harrison _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )