--On 16. September 2005 09:59:00 +0100 Petri Savolainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you really mean FCGI, what should be used instead? I understood that at least in the past, there was a per-request tcp/ip setup/teardown tax coming with apache mod_proxy which made something like FCGI a better alternative? Is this no longer the case, due to apache improvements perhaps, or is there something else?
The recommended and most often used approach is: Zope + reverse proxy (Squid or Apache). The FCGI code has not been touch for ages, nobody cares about the FCGI code, serious people don't use FCGI with Zope...so you should follow the straight forward approach and use a reverse proxy (which is
documented in a bunch of documentation). -aj
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )