David Pratt wrote at 2005-9-22 17:50 -0300:
>I am interested in what you might recommend when you are dealing with a
>number of virtual sites of the smaller zodb scale since this is really
>the issue I am attempting to solve. I definitely like the features ZEO
>has to offer as far as asynchronous maintenance, etc.
I have no experience with this.
My experience is with huge ZODB storages -- containing everything, even
large binary objects. It copes quite well.
How to proceed with lots of small virtual sites heavily depends
on your ressources. If I had plenty of resources, I would
each give its own Zope instance -- to make then as independent
from one another as possible. If my resource were very tight,
I would use a single Zope instance and a single storage
to spare resources as much as possible.
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -