David Pratt wrote at 2005-9-22 17:50 -0300:
> ...
>I am interested in what you might recommend when you are dealing with a 
>number of virtual sites of the smaller zodb scale since this is really 
>the issue I am attempting to solve.  I definitely like the features ZEO 
>has to offer as far as asynchronous maintenance, etc.

I have no experience with this.

My experience is with huge ZODB storages -- containing everything, even
large binary objects. It copes quite well.

How to proceed with lots of small virtual sites heavily depends
on your ressources. If I had plenty of resources, I would
each give its own Zope instance -- to make then as independent
from one another as possible. If my resource were very tight,
I would use a single Zope instance and a single storage
to spare resources as much as possible.

Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to