On 11/7/05, Jürgen Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 1. what do you mean by HAD? seems to be there still and looks quite
> useable.

I mean has. :)

> 2. if this works as expected, why not make DateTime a wrapper around
> python datetime objects?

Because that is a lot of work to make that work in a way that doesn't
instantly break every Zope instance in existance.

> what was the intention to create DateTime anyway, if there's a
> python pendant already?

It didn't exist then.

Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo     http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management     http://www.cps-project.org/
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to