John Ziniti wrote:
The problem I have with my "solution" is that I have
no clue what _p_jar is.
It's all to do with ZODB persistence. I'm not sure why the wrapper was
ever given a _p_jar, it's probably not a good idea, but then LocalFS is
very old but was very good at the time, so there's likely to be a good
reason for it to be there :-S
I dunno, try contact Jonathan Farr, the product's author and see if he
can remember. Other than that, maybe ask on [email protected] about any
problems you may experience from removing it :-S
My wories aren't so much about persistence, but whether these wrappers
will play nicely with the transation framework without a _p_jar. They
should, but I wouldn't want to bet on it...
good luck!
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
