John Ziniti wrote:
The problem I have with my "solution" is that I have
no clue what _p_jar is.


It's all to do with ZODB persistence. I'm not sure why the wrapper was ever given a _p_jar, it's probably not a good idea, but then LocalFS is very old but was very good at the time, so there's likely to be a good reason for it to be there :-S

I dunno, try contact Jonathan Farr, the product's author and see if he can remember. Other than that, maybe ask on zodb-dev@zope.org about any problems you may experience from removing it :-S

My wories aren't so much about persistence, but whether these wrappers will play nicely with the transation framework without a _p_jar. They should, but I wouldn't want to bet on it...

good luck!

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to