Tino Wildenhain wrote:
The funny thing is - performance isnt really the pro of
fcgi over http. Its really more about transporting header
and environment data from zope to apache, which is
kinda limited with mod_proxy. (Think alternative
authentication, ssl )

Indeed, and it's funny that the guy complaining was complaining about performance rather than this, which seems like quite a reasonable justification for keeping FCGI support.

Of course, it still doesn't change the fact that no-one knows how /wants to maintain it ;-)


Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to