Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > I think you missed the point. The main reason to ditch it is the fact > that there is no one who is willing and able to support the code for it > in Zope. Just because someone comes up with a combination where FCGI > might have a benefit still does not give us a developer to support it. > > jens > > On 21 Dec 2005, at 04:48, David Bear wrote: > >> could this be one reason to keep fastcgi? >> >> On 12/19/05, Robert Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using >> Apache 2.0, and I cannot find a solution to passing the >> value of REMOTE_USER from Apache to Zope when using a rewrite rule. I >> have Apache rewriting requests for Zope, and hooked into Tomcat with >> mod_jk. My users login through a servlet, and Apache has REMOTE_USER >> available to it. But any subsequent request to Zope loses this value. >> I used to have this all working when using FastCGI, but I'm hoping to >> use only mod_rewrite. Is it possible? >>
Regardless, REMOTE_USER is just an environment variable, and if you can *prove* it's being set in Apache but not passed to Zope, I'd be surprised. You can also use Apache directives to do this as well. It's been a while but SetEnv does spring to mind... Alan _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
