Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-3 08:20 +0200: >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote: >> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200: >> > ... >> >I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center >> >and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server >> >at the backup site an the ZEO at the main site. >> >> You will gain nothing -- as ZEO does not implement a cache >> but forwards any request immediately to the storage. >> Its only task is to synchronize concurrent access to a single >> storage -- nothing else. > >For my primary goal this whould do perfectly. Primarily I whan't the >zeo at backup site just to foward the request to the main site. All >I want is the i have only one place to change the config in case of a >failure at the main site. Nothing more. Everything else whould be nice >to have. But still the even just forwarding does not work right now.
Why would you want to use a ZEO server just for this relaying? Would it not be better to use a DNS name which you could remap at a central place (the DNS configuration) in case of problems? Or use a TCP forwarder. A ZEO server is definitely not appropriate just to relay requests. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
