On 6/24/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There would be VERY limited things an individual could upload.  I
personally argued strongly for 0 membership on this site.  If the ideas
of micro sites went forward, the appropriate micro sites could allow (or
not) membership as necessary.
> Who will decides which content is worth migration?
For the site I refer to, only that which meets the scope of the site.

-MAXINT from me. You are trying to make a top run "managed" site. I
think that is wrong for a collaborative software project by principle,
and it also means that ZF will have to pay sometbdy to create content
on the site, which to me seems to be a complete waste of money, when
reasonably the community members should do that themselves.

Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo     http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management     http://www.cps-project.org/
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to