On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 21:41 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote: > > Then I fear few interesting content will arrive at this site. > Well, I think the content of this site is what I'd noted is what I noted in earlier emails. It might not be 'interesting', but I would hope it to be quality and focused. I have faith the 'interesting' aspects you wish will come from the community.
> We use Plone.org's infrastructure. When I remember right, > we have membership there and this membership contributes > a good deal of valuable content (software, howtos, faqs). We have failed at managing the breadth of content and properly presenting it to potential and exisitng Zope users. Maybe that sub-community has not. > > Why should it be different for Zope.org? Because it has not shown it can rise to the occasion. Outside our community this might not be so obvious, but referring new co-workers to zope.org when they inquire as to the technology I bring to the table at work, is an embarrassment. I think my position is pretty clear. It's up to the Foundation ultimately. I was asked to get the proposal out. I've provided my view. The rest will become history. :) Andrew > > > _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )