-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 25 Feb 2007, at 20:48, Jean Lagarde wrote:

On 2/25/07, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Serving from cache still means they need to be touched at least once
to get them into the cache, and (in case of normal caching behavior)
they will be touched again once the cached record expires. Caching
will not make any difference to memory behavior I'd say.

Yes of course I forgot to mention that the caches also expire in my
reply. My experience so far is indeed that the caches save on the CPU
usage much more than on the memory.

Yes, that's true, CPU usage on the Zope side will definitely improve.

jens



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFF4gUmRAx5nvEhZLIRAkkeAJ9+ZRCHSRZrmkocnpb5AMbhhPJ/FACeOGNE
IrXNzyXUPDORP/MjxOa3Td0=
=Qo0B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to