On 11/7/07, michael nt milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone tried this or had any experience with this? We're using Enfold > Server and for staging and development purposes instead of using separate > machines we're thinking of setting up a 'virtual machines' on the same > server. There appear to be many benefits. However knowing > that Zope/Plone are RAM instensive this > could be an issue.
There is no issue in running Zope in Windows _or_ running Zope inside a VM. It does need the same amount of RAM as running it not inside a VM. Whether that counts as "RAM intensive" or not depends on what you do with it and whether you have a comparison to another application. VMs tend to have a bit lower performance per MHz, so if you can live with that (and have the RAM to feed the VM) go ahead. You can later decide to put it on a dedicated machine anyway. --knitti _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )