Maybe you could map it to libferris instead of the file system and then we could many types of different data storage.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9373 On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Garito wrote at 2008-2-29 00:35 +0100: > > >I can understand Yuri > >Zope uses the tree to run and the filesystem is a tree > > > >When I'm developing Yanged (my Zope project) I think about that. I would > >like to create a version of Zope with the most essential parts: > >the traverse way > >the adquisition > >in an apache module (and apache of course) > >the filesystem as object data base > >and Zope Smart Manager as ZMI > > It would not be that difficult: > > Your Apache module would call "ZPublisher.Publish.publish" > with a module name different from "Zope2". > > Your "Zope2" replacement would provide the objects > required by "ZPublisher.Publish.get_module_info". > It could e.g. use a LocalFS instance as "bobo_application" > and immediately, your objects would come from the filesystem (as > mapped by "LocalFS"). > > > > -- > Dieter > > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) > _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )