Maybe you could map it to libferris instead of the file system and
then we could many types of different data storage.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Garito wrote at 2008-2-29 00:35 +0100:
> >I can understand Yuri
> >Zope uses the tree to run and the filesystem is a tree
> >When I'm developing Yanged (my Zope project) I think about that. I would
> >like to create a version of Zope with the most essential parts:
> >the traverse way
> >the adquisition
> >in an apache module (and apache of course)
> >the filesystem as object data base
> >and Zope Smart Manager as ZMI
> It would not be that difficult:
> Your Apache module would call "ZPublisher.Publish.publish"
> with a module name different from "Zope2".
> Your "Zope2" replacement would provide the objects
> required by "ZPublisher.Publish.get_module_info".
> It could e.g. use a LocalFS instance as "bobo_application"
> and immediately, your objects would come from the filesystem (as
> mapped by "LocalFS").
> Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -