Andrew Milton wrote:
> | > I am fine with the current situation (with respect to "LocalFS",
> | > not with respect to "Zope")...
> |
> | Then you're part of the Zope problem ;-)
>
> As opposed to random deprecation and removal of interfaces that causes
> otherwise working code to break ?
Heh, Zope 2 has died a death of a thousand cuts.
Plohn was a pretty big slice in that ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
