On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Remember this:
> Well, that lead to this:
> One of the reasons I got suckered into replying was that I thought
> might be the result of some stuff a few of us had talked about at the
> Zope BOF at PyCon.
> I actually think having a 4.0 release of Zope that unifies things
> be used to make things a lot clearer...
> - Zope Framework 4.0
> What Martijn has announced and is already being worked on extensively.
> - Zope A 4.0
> What was to be Zope 2.12
> - Zope B 4.0
> Whatever the next pending release of the Zope 3 appserver stuff was to
> be. (Need to keep the Canonical and ZC guys happy afterall ;-) )
> www.zope.org could then just be a radically cut down link portal to
> a.zope.org, b.zope.org and framework.zope.org, which I'd imagine to be
> brochurewear, download and/or KGS sites for each of the above.
> I'd suggesting splitting the svn access stuff out to dev.zope.org
> because it transcends all three.
> docs.zope.org could hoover up the rest, with any remaining stuff being
> humanely dispatched.
> Seriously, how do people feel about this?
I don't think we need A&B. Maybe just "Zope" and "Zope Framework".
I like the idea of using a number larger than 3. (I've suggested 5 in
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -