Jürgen Herrmann wrote: > - localfs, as discussed which needed a few minor tweaks to keep it > running. i did them myself, primarily because i wanted to keep > going on immediately and i didn't want to look or even wait for > a fixed version. it wasn't rocket science to make those corrections > to the code, so no maintenance nightmare in sight here.
Given that so many of you seem to be doing this, why not one of you actually pick up the patches, apply them, release a version and maintain it until you no longer need LocalFS? All this independent patching seems a little insane... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )