-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Allen wrote:
> > * The tests were written for SQLALchemy 0.4, which had a > "session.save" method. SQLAlchemy 0.5 and 0.6 use "session.add". Do we > need to maintain support for SQLAlchemy 0.4? I am tempted to make this > new release support only 0.5 and 0.6, and see if anyone squawks. > Hopefully most everyone has migrated to at least 0.5. (We can support > both with conditional sqlalchemy.__version__ checks, but that can get > ugly). Nobody cares about SA 0.4. The most current version is 0.6 and 0.5 is in maintenance mode. Keeping the dependency stack in mind: SQlAlchemy <- zope.sqlalchemy <- z3c.sqlalchemy <- SQLAlchemyDA The complete stack must fit together. Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvXIj0ACgkQCJIWIbr9KYzFNgCdEob7aNohnR9uJkNfnUDYmOb5 yK8AoJmtBurrsvuulpNZelvdoGbTVVq9 =u/tn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )