2016-11-11 5:20 GMT-06:00 Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 09:12, Michael Howitz wrote:
> > You are right, it might look strange to have a Zope2 version 4.x.
> > But renaming the Package on PyPI would cause problems for all packages
> > which depend on Zope 4.x, especially for the ones which are even
> > compatible with Zope 2.x and 4.x.
> I agree that having the project/distribution name as Zope2 and the
> version as 4.x, 5.x, etc. isn't ideal.
> But by now there are probably hundreds of other projects, which depend
> on Zope2 in their setup.py. Not to mention all kinds of buildout files,
> testing configurations or tools, the configuration for sites like
> https://zope3.pov.lt/py3/ and many other things we don't know about.
> > @Hanno: What do you think about renaming the PyPI package to Zope?
> I think this is a cosmetic change, which at this point causes too much
> work and breakage for very little gain.
And why not start a new package call "zope" (in PyPi) that it's really
version 4. it's alpha version so no many projects are using it.
Lo bueno de vivir un dia mas
es saber que nos queda un dia menos de vida
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -