2016-11-11 5:20 GMT-06:00 Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 09:12, Michael Howitz wrote: > > You are right, it might look strange to have a Zope2 version 4.x. > > But renaming the Package on PyPI would cause problems for all packages > > which depend on Zope 4.x, especially for the ones which are even > > compatible with Zope 2.x and 4.x. > > I agree that having the project/distribution name as Zope2 and the > version as 4.x, 5.x, etc. isn't ideal. > > But by now there are probably hundreds of other projects, which depend > on Zope2 in their setup.py. Not to mention all kinds of buildout files, > testing configurations or tools, the configuration for sites like > https://zope3.pov.lt/py3/ and many other things we don't know about. > > > @Hanno: What do you think about renaming the PyPI package to Zope? > > I think this is a cosmetic change, which at this point causes too much > work and breakage for very little gain. > > Hanno >
And why not start a new package call "zope" (in PyPi) that it's really version 4. it's alpha version so no many projects are using it. -- ________________________________________ Lo bueno de vivir un dia mas es saber que nos queda un dia menos de vida
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
