> > Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation > > instead? > > Automatic code-generation is going to be even more important (and necessary) > in light of the forthcoming LLVM stuff. There's going to be even more code > that ought to be generated automatically, e.g., C thunks, and lots of > boilerplate LLVM C++ API code. I totally agree. However, as far as I understand the issue is orthogonal because this mostly concerns the runtime code and not the code for declaring the functions in the compiler/context. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
