> > Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation
> > instead?
> Automatic code-generation is going to be even more important (and necessary)
> in light of the forthcoming LLVM stuff. There's going to be even more code
> that ought to be generated automatically, e.g., C thunks, and lots of
> boilerplate LLVM C++ API code.
I totally agree. However, as far as I understand the issue is orthogonal
because this mostly concerns the runtime code and not the code for declaring
the functions in the compiler/context.
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp