1. The EQNames grammar is implemented. The new syntax is also
implemented in a branch, waiting to be merged.
2. The AtomicOrUnionType production is actually implemented indirectly
through the following rules from xquery_parser.y:
ItemType ::= AtomicType
AtomicType ::= QNAME
QNAME ::= QNAME_SVAL
| EQNAME
, so there isn't anything that needs to be done, as far as I understand.
Matthias, could you please double-check, confirm and then close the bug?
** Changed in: zorba
Assignee: Nicolae Brinza (nbrinza) => Matthias Brantner (matthias-brantner)
** Changed in: zorba
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zorba
Coders, which is the registrant for Zorba.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891453
Title:
XQuery grammar needs EQNames
Status in Zorba - The XQuery Processor:
Invalid
Bug description:
According to Matthias, the XQuery grammar needs to be extended to
support EQNames. There also needs to be an AtonicOrUntionType
production.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zorba/+bug/891453/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
