1. The EQNames grammar is implemented. The new syntax is also
implemented in a branch, waiting to be merged.

2. The AtomicOrUnionType production is actually implemented indirectly
through the following rules from xquery_parser.y:

ItemType  ::=  AtomicType

AtomicType  ::=  QNAME

                      |  EQNAME

, so there isn't anything that needs to be done, as far as I understand.

Matthias, could you please double-check, confirm and then close the bug?

** Changed in: zorba
     Assignee: Nicolae Brinza (nbrinza) => Matthias Brantner (matthias-brantner)

** Changed in: zorba
       Status: New => Invalid

You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zorba
Coders, which is the registrant for Zorba.

  XQuery grammar needs EQNames

Status in Zorba - The XQuery Processor:

Bug description:
  According to Matthias, the XQuery grammar needs to be extended to
  support EQNames.  There also needs to be an AtonicOrUntionType

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to     : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to