Chris Hillery has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots into lp:zorba.
Commit message: A few EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE() changes to match the current RQ machine. Requested reviews: Chris Hillery (ceejatec) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots/+merge/147504 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots/+merge/147504 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
=== modified file 'test/fots/CMakeLists.txt' --- test/fots/CMakeLists.txt 2013-02-03 11:23:36 +0000 +++ test/fots/CMakeLists.txt 2013-02-09 10:36:23 +0000 @@ -116,6 +116,11 @@ EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-Demos currencysvg 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-Demos itunes 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-number-all 0) + +# Next two possibly unique to old RQ machine +EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-tokenize-7 0) +EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-tokenize-all 0) + EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-copy-attributes-1 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-copy-attributes-all 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-id-from-element-1 0) @@ -495,7 +500,10 @@ EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-node-name fn-node-name-28 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-space fn-normalize-space-23 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-space fn-normalize-space-25 0) -EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode fn-normalize-unicode-11 0) + +# This test passes on the old and new RQ machines; fixed? +#EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode fn-normalize-unicode-11 0) + EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode cbcl-fn-normalize-unicode-001 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode cbcl-fn-normalize-unicode-006 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-parse-xml parse-xml-001 0) @@ -700,7 +708,10 @@ EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (op-union fn-union-node-args-016 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (op-union fn-union-node-args-017 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-013 0) -EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-016 0) + +# This test passes on the old RQ machine but not the new; weird. +#EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-016 0) + EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-3 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-26 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-27 0) @@ -757,6 +768,10 @@ EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastableExpr cbcl-castable-yearMonthDuration-002 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr CastAs674a 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr K-SeqExprCast-71b 0) + +# Following test fails on old RQ machine but not new. +EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr CastAsNamespaceSensitiveType-10 0) + EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-date-001 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-date-002 0) EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-dateTime-001 0)
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
