Chris Hillery has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots into 
lp:zorba.

Commit message:
A few EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE() changes to match the current RQ machine.

Requested reviews:
  Chris Hillery (ceejatec)

For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots/+merge/147504
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/rq-add-fots/+merge/147504
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
=== modified file 'test/fots/CMakeLists.txt'
--- test/fots/CMakeLists.txt	2013-02-03 11:23:36 +0000
+++ test/fots/CMakeLists.txt	2013-02-09 10:36:23 +0000
@@ -116,6 +116,11 @@
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-Demos currencysvg 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-Demos itunes 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-number-all 0)
+
+# Next two possibly unique to old RQ machine
+EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-tokenize-7 0)
+EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFn functx-fn-tokenize-all 0)
+
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-copy-attributes-1 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-copy-attributes-all 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (app-FunctxFunctx functx-functx-id-from-element-1 0)
@@ -495,7 +500,10 @@
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-node-name fn-node-name-28 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-space fn-normalize-space-23 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-space fn-normalize-space-25 0)
-EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode fn-normalize-unicode-11 0)
+
+# This test passes on the old and new RQ machines; fixed?
+#EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode fn-normalize-unicode-11 0)
+
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode cbcl-fn-normalize-unicode-001 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-normalize-unicode cbcl-fn-normalize-unicode-006 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (fn-parse-xml parse-xml-001 0)
@@ -700,7 +708,10 @@
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (op-union fn-union-node-args-016 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (op-union fn-union-node-args-017 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-013 0)
-EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-016 0)
+
+# This test passes on the old RQ machine but not the new; weird.
+#EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-AllowingEmpty outer-016 0)
+
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-3 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-26 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-Annotation annotation-27 0)
@@ -757,6 +768,10 @@
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastableExpr cbcl-castable-yearMonthDuration-002 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr CastAs674a 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr K-SeqExprCast-71b 0)
+
+# Following test fails on old RQ machine but not new.
+EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr CastAsNamespaceSensitiveType-10 0)
+
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-date-001 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-date-002 0)
 EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-CastExpr.derived cbcl-cast-dateTime-001 0)

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to     : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to