> The current XQuery 3.0 spec does not talk about implicit iteration for dyn 
> func invocation. But I remember Ghislain syaing that he will try to add 
> implicit iteration to the spec. Don't know if he tried and failed, or did not 
> try at all, or whether he actually succeeded and it just has not been made 
> public yet.
> 
> But no matter what, this is a case where I wouldn't mind a slight divergence 
> from the official spec as the resulting implementation is much cleaner and 
> actually more general as well. 
I have removed the implicit iteration from the dynamic function invocation for 
now.
When will the hof branch be merged?

> Furthermore, I think we should get rid of the ZORBA_WITH_JSONIQ compiler flag 
> and use an option to enable/disable jsoniq. So, we can get back to 100% 
> XQuery conformance by disabling jsoniq.
I have added such a flag to the Zorba_CompilerOptions in the parser branch.
That's at least a start and we can take it from there. What do you think?


>> On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Markos Zaharioudakis <markos...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Review: Needs Fixing
>>> 
>>> The implicit iteration should always be done in the translator, not in the
>> runtime (actually, that's how it is in the hof branch). So the new do-loop in
>> dynamic_function_iterator.cpp should be removed.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-
>> empty_selectors/+merge/153615
>>> You proposed lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-empty_selectors for merging.
> -- 
> https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-empty_selectors/+merge/153615
> You proposed lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-empty_selectors for merging.


-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-empty_selectors/+merge/153615
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to     : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to