I agree with your logic, Juan; thanks for spelling it out. I hadn't realized
that your new flag were not checked in the inner loop of fn:subsequence(), but
looking at the implementation it appears that is the case. So I have no problem
Voting Approve now, although clearly the two failing FOTS tests will need to be
addressed before it will merge.
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp