> - The fix for dynamic_function_invocation seems to be orthogonal. Why is this
> fixed in this merge proposal? I couldn't find a test to cover this behavior.
> It does fix some of the W3C tests:
> for $f in () return $f(1, ?)
> Raised an error in zorba because it was considered an object lookup. But it
> looks like valid XQuery to me?
This is one of the cases that we will have to live with. It's a conflict between
JSONiq and HOF. We were trying to push the W3C to make the dynamic function
a map (i.e. $f could be () or a sequence of function items). However, the w3c
want to go this way.
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp