> - The fix for dynamic_function_invocation seems to be orthogonal. Why is this > fixed in this merge proposal? I couldn't find a test to cover this behavior. > > It does fix some of the W3C tests: > > for $f in () return $f(1, ?) > > Raised an error in zorba because it was considered an object lookup. But it > looks like valid XQuery to me? This is one of the cases that we will have to live with. It's a conflict between JSONiq and HOF. We were trying to push the W3C to make the dynamic function invocation a map (i.e. $f could be () or a sequence of function items). However, the w3c didn't want to go this way.
-- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-1123165/+merge/159822 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp